In message <3d6iu3dq6gecop3d4jtppmlmbqs3bapjlf@4ax.com>, MM
writes
>On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 14:36:08 -0000, "TD" wrote:
>
>>
>>"count zero" wrote in message
>>news:f1ebefdd-ea47-4047-8fb0-fb2f80e67a01@e10g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
>>> At present we have people signing on in more than one place using
>>> alias. We need a biometric card with a unique encryption. I also think
>>> credit cards should carry photographs.
>>
>>"there are no plans at this stage to make the delivery of particular public
>>services dependent on the production of an identity card" - Meg Hillier
>>(Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Identity, Home Office), 25 Feb 2008
>
>"no plans at this stage" is Newspeak for "if we need them, we'll get
>the plans".
>
>MM
From last night's BBC4 'Frost Report is Back' (documentary plus re-play
of a classic episode), this means "We will be introducing them
tomorrow".
--
Ian |
1479221. Re: ID cards, my personal view
1479236. Re: ID cards, my personal view
1479243. Re: ID cards, my personal view
1479303. Re: ID cards, my personal view
1479338. Re: ID cards, my personal view
1479341. Re: ID cards, my personal view
1479398. Re: ID cards, my personal view
1479399. Re: ID cards, my personal view
1479493. Re: ID cards, my personal view
1479542. Re: ID cards, my personal view
1479737. Re: ID cards, my personal view
1479949. Re: ID cards, my personal view
1479968. Re: ID cards, my personal view
1480014. Re: ID cards, my personal view
1480172. Re: ID cards, my personal view
|
|
|