On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 16:02:19 +0000, Alang
wrote:
>On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 10:00:35 +0000, judith
>wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 09:51:06 +0000, MM wrote:
>>
>>>On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 17:58:55 +1300, "Jonny"
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>"Andy" wrote in message
>>>>news:c4a43d0c-ed47-4fce-8a10-6574b97931dd@u10g2000prn.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>I am not against the idea of ID cards per-se , but I am seriously
>>>>> worried about the cross-linking of them with government (and worse,
>>>>> third party) databases.
>>>>
>>>>Id cards wouldn't be necessary if you had a half pie efficient government.
>>>>It's pretty outrageous that the british government has so little clue about
>>>>who is in the country. You are an Island nation like us (New Zealand), so
>>>>simply make use of this advantage to secure your borders and ID cards won't
>>>>be necessary.
>>>
>>>Yes, but you could count all the people in NZ in an afternoon.
>>>
>>>MM
>>
>>Is the number different from those there in a morning?
>
>There are always people dying and new ones getting born.
>Immigrants. Emigrants
I don't think they "do" immigrants, do they? Aren't they all extremely
strict down under?
MM |
1479221. Re: ID cards, my personal view
1479236. Re: ID cards, my personal view
1479243. Re: ID cards, my personal view
1479303. Re: ID cards, my personal view
1479338. Re: ID cards, my personal view
1479341. Re: ID cards, my personal view
1479398. Re: ID cards, my personal view
1479399. Re: ID cards, my personal view
1479493. Re: ID cards, my personal view
1479542. Re: ID cards, my personal view
1479949. Re: ID cards, my personal view
1479968. Re: ID cards, my personal view
1480014. Re: ID cards, my personal view
1480172. Re: ID cards, my personal view
|
|
|