On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 23:18:02 -0000, "Steve Walker"
wrote:
>Matt wrote:
>> "Mike G" wrote in message
>> news:13uitifdl1ak0f@corp.supernews.com...
>>>
>>> "Matt" wrote in message
>>> news:VieGj.13570$w51.8550@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>>>>
>>>> "MM" wrote in message
>>>> news:3lriu3ttv3fghhjq37q7pieul6ea9e2pap@4ax.com...
>>>>> On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 19:10:21 GMT, "Matt" wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Mike G" wrote in message
>>>>>> news:13uiflfrpgbfucc@corp.supernews.com...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Baldoni" wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:mn.cc267d833096882b.81063@gmail.com...
>>>>>>>> john smith formulated the question :
>>>>>>>>> Hi there!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Just wondering if anyone had any ideas why there have been no
>>>>>>>>> recent news items about the "extensive" investigation into the
>>>>>>>>> Jersey children's home scandal? Google news dates the last
>>>>>>>>> item as the 7th March, and I've read nothing about it in the
>>>>>>>>> Sunday papers, let alone
>>>>>>>>> heard anything on the TV news...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Just been on Channel 5 news
>>>>>
>>>>> Did they give you a cup of tea?
>>>>>
>>>>> MM
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> What is that supposed to mean?
>>>
>>> Guess....Your comment was ambiguous.
>>> Mike.
>>
>> Indeed. Also disagreed with him in another post.
>
>No Matt, what Mike meant was that your comment could've been read as "it has
>just been on Channel 5 news" or "I have just been on Channel 5 news". MM
>was cracking a joke.
Yeah, and mine are far better than the filth that passes for wit on
The Friday Night Project.
MM |