On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 23:31:49 -0000, "Mike G"
wrote:
>
>"Steve Walker" wrote in message
>news:64tfh9F2d2alvU1@mid.individual.net...
>> Matt wrote:
>>> "Mike G" wrote in message
>>> news:13uitifdl1ak0f@corp.supernews.com...
>>>>
>>>> "Matt" wrote in message
>>>> news:VieGj.13570$w51.8550@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>>>>>
>>>>> "MM" wrote in message
>>>>> news:3lriu3ttv3fghhjq37q7pieul6ea9e2pap@4ax.com...
>>>>>> On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 19:10:21 GMT, "Matt"
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Mike G" wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:13uiflfrpgbfucc@corp.supernews.com...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Baldoni" wrote in message
>>>>>>>> news:mn.cc267d833096882b.81063@gmail.com...
>>>>>>>>> john smith formulated the question :
>>>>>>>>>> Hi there!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Just wondering if anyone had any ideas why there have
>>>>>>>>>> been no
>>>>>>>>>> recent news items about the "extensive" investigation
>>>>>>>>>> into the
>>>>>>>>>> Jersey children's home scandal? Google news dates the
>>>>>>>>>> last
>>>>>>>>>> item as the 7th March, and I've read nothing about it
>>>>>>>>>> in the
>>>>>>>>>> Sunday papers, let alone
>>>>>>>>>> heard anything on the TV news...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Just been on Channel 5 news
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Did they give you a cup of tea?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> MM
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> What is that supposed to mean?
>>>>
>>>> Guess....Your comment was ambiguous.
>>>> Mike.
>>>
>>> Indeed. Also disagreed with him in another post.
>>
>> No Matt, what Mike meant was that your comment could've been
>> read as "it has just been on Channel 5 news" or "I have just
>> been on Channel 5 news". MM was cracking a joke.
>
>Jokes are never as effective if they have to be explained. :-)
Can you explain that, please? I didn't get it...
MM |