wrote in message
news:2984e1b7-25ec-4079-b2a8-088ea80e2829@8g2000hsu.googlegroups.com...
> On 26 Mar, 05:41, raffles-...@hotmail.com wrote:
>> I totally agreed witht the Janitor
>> 1. Nobody sane believes O'Gara 2. Nobody at all believes you, and 3.
>> Nobody cares
>
> ======================================================
>
> Not true:
>
> 1. Everybody knows Noel O'Gara is correct in the essentials of his
> thesis; they say differently because they are afraid or because they
> are employed by the ruling group to monitor freedom of expression on
> these pages and to pull people back into the *fake debates* authorised
> by the ruling group;
I know that O'Gara is wrong and that he has an irrational obsession with the
Ripper which borders on lunacy. I am neither afraid nor am I employed by the
"ruling group" whatever that is supposed to mean.
>
> 2. Ditto.
As you say, ditto.
>
> 3. People don't care much. They are interested in all of this, but
> afraid to say anything constructive about it for the most part.
>
> It's a very serious matter, when we now have no way of freeing people
> who are wrongly convicted, because we are afraid of being bankrupted
> by a libel suit. Constable Gregg is negating one of the most
> fundmental of civil liberties - the right to say a citizen has been
> wrongly convicted - which always conveys that those who convicted him
> are either incompetent or corrupt - and the freedom to say that
> without fear of being bankrupted by a libel suit. We're in deep shit
> in this country if we no longer have that freedom.
Are you seriously suggesting that when a person has been convicted of a
crime and any appeal he has chosen to pursue has been exhausted, the
authorities should take your advice about who should or should be regarded
as innocent?
You should forget about the Ripper case and move on with your life. See if
you can prove that Brady and Hindley were innocent.
|