On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 11:43:41 -0000, "The Todal"
wrote:
>
> wrote in message
>news:2984e1b7-25ec-4079-b2a8-088ea80e2829@8g2000hsu.googlegroups.com...
>> On 26 Mar, 05:41, raffles-...@hotmail.com wrote:
>>> I totally agreed witht the Janitor
>>> 1. Nobody sane believes O'Gara 2. Nobody at all believes you, and 3.
>>> Nobody cares
>>
>> ======================================================
>>
>> Not true:
>>
>> 1. Everybody knows Noel O'Gara is correct in the essentials of his
>> thesis; they say differently because they are afraid or because they
>> are employed by the ruling group to monitor freedom of expression on
>> these pages and to pull people back into the *fake debates* authorised
>> by the ruling group;
>
>I know that O'Gara is wrong and that he has an irrational obsession with the
>Ripper which borders on lunacy. I am neither afraid nor am I employed by the
>"ruling group" whatever that is supposed to mean.
>
>>
>> 2. Ditto.
>
>As you say, ditto.
>
>>
>> 3. People don't care much. They are interested in all of this, but
>> afraid to say anything constructive about it for the most part.
>>
>> It's a very serious matter, when we now have no way of freeing people
>> who are wrongly convicted, because we are afraid of being bankrupted
>> by a libel suit. Constable Gregg is negating one of the most
>> fundmental of civil liberties - the right to say a citizen has been
>> wrongly convicted - which always conveys that those who convicted him
>> are either incompetent or corrupt - and the freedom to say that
>> without fear of being bankrupted by a libel suit. We're in deep shit
>> in this country if we no longer have that freedom.
>
>Are you seriously suggesting that when a person has been convicted of a
>crime and any appeal he has chosen to pursue has been exhausted, the
>authorities should take your advice about who should or should be regarded
>as innocent?
>
>You should forget about the Ripper case and move on with your life. See if
>you can prove that Brady and Hindley were innocent.
>
I think there would be more of a challenge in proving Tony Holland is
sane.
woof woof |