Deadrat wrote:
> "_ Prof. Jonez _" wrote in
> news:64veooF2dqmctU1@mid.individual.net:
>
>> Deadrat wrote:
>>> "Reality_Check©" wrote in
>>>> "Bo Raxo" wrote in message
>>>>> "Reality_Check©" wrote in message
>>>>>> "Bo Raxo" wrote in message
>>>>>>> "Reality_Check©" wrote in message
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Did Federal Drug Laws not apply to the Felonies in question?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Not established they were felonies,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do tell how one can conspire to purchase/possess cocaine
>>>>>> without committing a felony.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> He admitted to using cocaine. Someone comes up to you at a party,
>>>>> asks if you want some - that's happened to me. They're offering
>>>>> to share their drugs.
>>>>
>>>> Conspiracy to distribute/possess
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> No need to conspire, to purchase, to possess.
>>>>
>>>> If there is an offer, agreement and acceptance to engage in
>>>> criminal activity, and an overt act in furtherance of that crime,
>>>> you have conspiracy. Ipso facto
>>>
>>> Sure, but it must be the same criminal act. If I buy drugs, I'm not
>>> conspiring with a drug dealer to distribute drugs.
>>
>> Bullshit. Are the drugs not being distributed to you? Have you
>> not agreed and taken an overt act in effecting that distribution?
>
> I don't know how to make this any clearer. I'm not distributing
> cocaine by hoovering it.
By accepting the cocaine from the distributor, you the distributee,
become the necessary link in the chain of distribution.
It doesn't get any clearer than that, numbnuts.
Now go smoke another joint, stoner.
|