Always remember that just because you are paranoid it does not mean that the
are not out to get you.
Conspiracy theories are usually rubbish. A successful conspiracy depend on a
small number of plotters.
The Princess Di murder plot seems to have everybody involved including their
dogs.
The 9/11 conspiracy seems to involve the entire government of the USA. You
can't keep something like that secret without someone breaking ranks.
The Common Purpose plot already involves far too many people. The criteria
for involvement appears to be disagreeing with the speaker at this rather
bizarre meeting.
Paul
"ŽiŠardo" wrote in message
news:a%dGj.105429$nw4.21608@fe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
> andycooper3@googlemail.com wrote:
>> On 25 Mar, 16:12, Keith2.0 wrote:
>>> On Sun, 23 Mar 2008 13:47:22 -0700 (PDT), Turk182
>>>
>>> wrote:
>>>> It's a long video - but if you have an hour free watch it. Are they
>>>> expecting an invasion, or is they're some other reason for the
>>>> allegedly underhand way the secretive organisation "Common Purpose" is
>>>> evolving.
>>>> http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=3664960863576873594
>>> More nonsence conspiracy theorys. I suppose CP were behind the grassy
>>> knoll or did the 7/7 bombings or shot deMenezes - laughable!
>>
>> You don't really have a case when it comes to the Menezes killing.
>> Within hours, the so called 'conspiracy theorists' came out with
>> information the British public had to wait six months or more to
>> eventually find out.
>> 7/7..... No public inquiry , something that the victims want but the
>> government is very reluctant to do.
>
> And meanwhile, in a foreign country:
>
>
>> 9/11 ...Bush eventually caved in to an inquiry but it was woefully
>> underfunded. More money was spent on the Clinton- Lewinsky affair.
>> Both 7/7 and 9/11 occurred on the same day as extensive war games/
>> emergency planning exercises. Both curiously had the exact same
>> scenarios as what really happened. No conspiracies there .... Just
>> simple facts. Then again, i wouldn't expect someone as trusting as you
>> to be suspicious of officialdom. There is no credible instances of the
>> masses being lied to ....Is there?
>
>
> --
> Moving things in still pictures!
|