Deadrat wrote:
> "_ Prof. Jonez _" wrote
>> Deadrat wrote:
>>> "_ Prof. Jonez _" wrote in
>>>> Deadrat wrote:
>>>>> "Reality_Check©" wrote in
>>>>>> "Bo Raxo" wrote in message
>>>>>>> "Reality_Check©" wrote in message
>>>>>>>> "Bo Raxo" wrote in message
>>>>>>>>> "Reality_Check©" wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Did Federal Drug Laws not apply to the Felonies in question?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Not established they were felonies,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Do tell how one can conspire to purchase/possess cocaine
>>>>>>>> without committing a felony.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> He admitted to using cocaine. Someone comes up to you at a
>>>>>>> party, asks if you want some - that's happened to me. They're
>>>>>>> offering to share their drugs.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Conspiracy to distribute/possess
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No need to conspire, to purchase, to possess.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If there is an offer, agreement and acceptance to engage in
>>>>>> criminal activity, and an overt act in furtherance of that crime,
>>>>>> you have conspiracy. Ipso facto
>>>>>
>>>>> Sure, but it must be the same criminal act. If I buy drugs, I'm
>>>>> not conspiring with a drug dealer to distribute drugs.
>>>>
>>>> Bullshit. Are the drugs not being distributed to you? Have you
>>>> not agreed and taken an overt act in effecting that distribution?
>>>
>>> I don't know how to make this any clearer. I'm not distributing
>>> cocaine by hoovering it.
>>
>> By accepting the cocaine from the distributor, you the distributee,
>> become the necessary link in the chain of distribution.
>
> Which is a bad thing for the distributor, should he be caught.
And equally bad for the distributee, when they get charged and convicted
with distrubution, criminal attempt and/or criminal conspiracy to distribute.
>
> The bank teller is a necessary link in the chain of bank robberies
> (or is that the robbery of a chain of banks?). Are you going to
> charge her too?
Is that how far you've sunk ?
Seek a CAT scan ... immediately.
|