Passports: HOME | EUROPE | AMERICAS, AUSTRALIA and OCEANIA | ASIA | AFRICA | OTHER DOCUMENTS
National Anthems:[ www.national-anthems.net ] ++
Travel:[ Europe ] [ Asia ] [ USA-Canada ] [ Latin-America ] [ Africa ] [ Australia ] [ more ]
[ Australia legal ] [ U.K. legal ] [ U.S. visa ] [ Immigration ] [ Marriage based U.S visa ]



Re: Innocent Download of kp Posted on: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 20:37:31 +0000

On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 19:24:29 GMT, Palindrome wrote:

>> Do you or do you not recall the case of the man convicted a few months
>> ago for taking photos of girls in bikinis at a public swimming pool
>> that was discussed on this newsgroup?

>This one?

>http://www.yorkshireeveningpost.co.uk/news/Community-order-for-diving-school.1485230.jp

No, nothing close. I'll see if I can find it.

>> If not, I could search for the media article and provide you with the
>> evidence you demand.

>> Meanwhile, be assured that I know for a certainty that such
>> prosecutions have taken place. Not very often, and it is not a
>> significant proportion of prosecutions for this offence, but they have
>> happened.

>My tame CPS person doesn't know of such a case. It must be a very
>insignificant proportion of prosecutions.

I have no doubt that it is. The fact that there was even a single
prosecution of that type is worrying.

>> It suits the industry to describe all illegal images as, "images of
>> child abuse". But I have no doubt whatsoever that the vast majority
>> of images that are available on the Internet which would be judged to
>> be indecent in a UK court do *not* involve the slightest abuse to the
>> child whatsoever, nor any .ual activity. The obvious reason being
>> that such images are legal in many countries and so are bound to be
>> more prolific than images that are illegal in every country of the
>> World.

>I would agree that the system does itself no favours by including images
>which, on their own, would not result in conviction. The reason,
>presumably, is to establish that the individual does have an unhealty
>and sustained interest in children and the half a dozen really sick
>images are not just a momentaty aberration.

>I am told that the CPS would not charge based solely on the possession
>of level 1 images. Irrespective of how many.

ISTR a recent prosecution cited on this group that involved a few
level 1 images and a single level 2 image.

I think you are also aware of a conviction for possession of a single
level 1 image.

--
Cynic
1474142. Re: Innocent Download of kp
1474150. Re: Innocent Download of kp
1474152. Re: Innocent Download of kp
1474154. Re: Innocent Download of kp
1474166. Re: Innocent Download of kp
1474167. Re: Innocent Download of kp
1474171. Re: Innocent Download of kp
1474205. Re: Innocent Download of kp
1474209. Re: Innocent Download of kp
1474222. Re: Innocent Download of kp
1480735. Re: Innocent Download of kp
1480736. Re: Innocent Download of kp
1480745. Re: Innocent Download of kp
1480747. Re: Innocent Download of kp
1480749. Re: Innocent Download of kp
1480761. Re: Innocent Download of kp
1480767. Re: Innocent Download of kp
1480782. Re: Innocent Download of kp
1480784. Re: Innocent Download of kp
1480788. Re: Innocent Download of kp