On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 09:27:27 GMT, Palindrome wrote:
>Dillon wrote:
>> On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 00:07:38 +0000, Cynic
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 22:58:16 +0000, Dissenter wrote:
>>>
>>>>> It is a deliberate act against the law as
>>>>> much as driving past a speed camera is a deliberate act. There are no
>>>>> other higher principles at stake. They want this form of entertainment.
>>>>> This form of entertainment isn't available to them legally. So they
>>>>> choose to break the law.
>>
>> Are you saying any law is right just because it is on the statute book
>> ?
>No. I am saying that a law should be obeyed unless there is a good
>reason not to. Protest against any law by all means.
>
>> So the Nuremburg laws in Nazi germany which culminated in the murder
>> of millions of jews were right just because the party in power was
>> able to force them through in an abuse of power.
>
>Ah Godwin. About time. I am not aware of any impending legislation that
>would put kp downloaders in cattle trucks and ship them off to gas
>chambers. Rest assured, should there be so, I would write to my MP.
>
>All the law asks is for people to refrain from keeping indecent images
>that appear to be of children - without good reason. It doesn't seem
>much to ask, in the scheme of things.
I agree Sue of course not but what about the new `Extreme . Law`
A further step in censoring the internet as far as uk citizens go.
A law is only as good as the people enforcing it,if they are corrupt
then its better that the law does not exist.Corrupt police and corrupt
postal officals in the USA put that man in the `Ore` case in prison
for 50 years.
D
|