On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 12:53:34 GMT, Palindrome wrote:
>Cynic wrote:
>> On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 09:27:27 GMT, Palindrome wrote:
>>
>>> Ah Godwin. About time. I am not aware of any impending legislation that
>>> would put kp downloaders in cattle trucks and ship them off to gas
>>> chambers. Rest assured, should there be so, I would write to my MP.
>>
>> The effect on many people has been very similar.
>>
>>> All the law asks is for people to refrain from keeping indecent images
>>> that appear to be of children - without good reason. It doesn't seem
>>> much to ask, in the scheme of things.
>>
>> And if the law asked for every Jewish person to wear a distinctive arm
>> band, that would also surely not be too much to ask, in the scheme of
>> things, would it?
>>
>One is the slight restriction on one form of "entertainment" featuring
>acts of abuse against children. Have you any idea how ridiculous your
>comparisons are getting?
Sue have you any idea how many millions of men will be affected by the
new extreme . law ?
This is how it is.
Men like to look at . images(of all sorts)
The new extreme . law is so vaguely worded that the police can take
just about any .ography and make a case against it as being
unlawfull whike the rest of the world does not.
So the Jesus freaks are winning.
D |