In article <6524qvF2do6csU1@mid.individual.net>,
"_ Prof. Jonez _" wrote:
> Thanatos wrote:
> > In article <650orpF2d8gejU1@mid.individual.net>,
> > "Reality_Check©" wrote:
> >
> >> "Thanatos" wrote in message
> >>> "_ Prof. Jonez _" wrote:
> >>>> Thanatos wrote:
> >>>>> "_ Prof. Jonez _" wrote:
> >>>>>> Thanatos wrote:
> >>>>>>> "Reality_Check©" wrote:
> >>>>>>>> "Bo Raxo" wrote in message
> >>>>>>>>> "Reality_Check©" wrote in message
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Did Federal Drug Laws not apply to the Felonies in question?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Not established they were felonies,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Do tell how one can conspire to purchase/possess cocaine
> >>>>>>>> without committing a felony.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Do tell how the president of the United States can pardon
> >>>>>>> someone for a violation of state law.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Who said it was state law, asswipe?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> A state law violation was the topic under discussion
> >>>>
> >>>> Really? Do tell.
> >>>
> >>> I did tell.
> >>>
> >>>>> when you claimed
> >>>>> the president could issue a pardon for it.
> >>>>
> >>>> Why do you lie?
> >>>
> >>> Do tell how the president of the United States can
> >>> pardon someone for a violation of state law.
> >>
> >> Who said it was a violation of State law, eh jackass ?
> >
> > A state law violation was the topic under discussion
>
> You're lying again, asswipe. The OP never claimed it
> was a "state law" violation.
Well, it would have to have been because the offense he said he was
convicted of doesn't exist on the federal level.
Besides, it doesn't matter because when I responded to your claim that
president could issue a pardon by pointing out that the president can't
issue pardons for state law violations, you claimed I was wrong about
that. It was only after I provided several legal citations to back up my
claim and you realized you were flat wrong that you retreated to your
typical name-calling and "you're lying" bullshit.
It's what you always do whenever you're proven wrong about anything. In
fact, it's the surest sign that you know you've been beaten. |