In article <650s90F2dm612U1@mid.individual.net>,
"Reality_Check©" wrote:
> "Larry" wrote in message
> news:x-275442.01470227032008@earthlink.vsrv-sjc.supernews.net...
> > In article <650p31F2a00g8U1@mid.individual.net>,
> > "Reality_Check©" wrote:
> >
> >> "Larry" wrote in message
> >> news:x-A92621.22111926032008@earthlink.vsrv-sjc.supernews.net...
> >> > In article <47e9e44e$0$25981$88260bb3@free.teranews.com>,
> >> > "Reality_Check©" wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> "Bo Raxo" wrote in message
> >> >> news:poednQtjzYamQ3TanZ2dnUVZ_sOrnZ2d@comcast.com...
> >> >> >
> >> >> > "Reality_Check©" wrote in message
> >> >> > news:64u2avF2dc8sbU1@mid.individual.net...
> >> >> >>
> >> >> > >
> >> >> >> Did Federal Drug Laws not apply to the Felonies in question?
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Not established they were felonies,
> >> >>
> >> >> Do tell how one can conspire to purchase/possess cocaine
> >> >> without committing a felony.
> >> >
> >> > Easily. If I was to work out an agreement with you to drive me to my
> >> > dealer to buy some cocaine, we've conspired to purchase it. We're both
> >> > guilty of Class A misdemeanors in New York.
> >>
> >> You're jumping in late. With respect to the thread and the discussion,
> >> the implication was the conspiracy/agreement between the dealer and
> >> purchaser.
> >
> > That's YOUR implication, fool, and yours alone. As I and others have
> > pointed out to you, it is legally impossible for dealers and purchasers
> > to be co-conspirators.
>
> Complete bullshit.
Would you like me to cite cases for you? Or would you just obtusely
disbelieve them, too?>
> > They have an agreement, of course, but its not a
> > conspiracy
>
> An agreement to violate the drug distribution laws.
Is not a conspiracy under any state or federal law. |