"Cynic" wrote in message
news:qc1ou3plm5etrhluj1m1qqkvmqr1sp4rc8@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 20:05:33 -0000, "Joe Lee"
> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Dissenter" wrote in message
>>news:okmnu3lr7pdlf4joata6k1peil4jq5853s@4ax.com...
>>> On Thu, 27 Mar 2008 17:15:32 GMT, Palindrome wrote:
>>>
>>>>Cynic wrote:
>>>
>>>>> As above. And in reality of course, the parent who has seen the
>>>>> .ography has a bigger secret to keep than the victim (though I
>>>>> agree that the victim may not see it that way).
>>>>
>>>>Oh, he wouldn't give /that/ reason for the son/daughter to keep away.
>>>
>>> Why should he want his children to keep away from the . model?
>>
>>
>>How on earth do you consider that a child who has been subjected to .ual
>>abuse is a ". model" ??
>
> Perhaps that was meant to be looking through the eyes of the person
> who collects such images in order to decide on *his* probable
> attitude?
It doesn't seem at all likely considering that Dissenter also said
"I would have thought that he would want her to come around, now that he
has seen her images."
Perhaps where Dissenter said "I would have thought", we might here be able
to assume that he was speaking for himself. What do you think ?
Also, while not forgetting this is a fictitious situation, would you also
want her to come round knowing that you have indecent images of her on your
computer ?
--
Joe Lee
|