"Larry" wrote in message
news:x-54FA54.23355527032008@earthlink.vsrv-sjc.supernews.net...
> In article <653422F2dlijnU1@mid.individual.net>,
> "Reality_Check©" wrote:
>
>> "Larry" wrote in message
>> news:x-E6FF6D.22011727032008@earthlink.vsrv-sjc.supernews.net...
>> > In article <650s90F2dm612U1@mid.individual.net>,
>> > "Reality_Check©" wrote:
>> >
>> >> "Larry" wrote in message
>> >> news:x-275442.01470227032008@earthlink.vsrv-sjc.supernews.net...
>> >> > In article <650p31F2a00g8U1@mid.individual.net>,
>> >> > "Reality_Check©" wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> "Larry" wrote in message
>> >> >> news:x-A92621.22111926032008@earthlink.vsrv-sjc.supernews.net...
>> >> >> > In article <47e9e44e$0$25981$88260bb3@free.teranews.com>,
>> >> >> > "Reality_Check©" wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> "Bo Raxo" wrote in message
>> >> >> >> news:poednQtjzYamQ3TanZ2dnUVZ_sOrnZ2d@comcast.com...
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > "Reality_Check©" wrote in message
>> >> >> >> > news:64u2avF2dc8sbU1@mid.individual.net...
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> > >
>> >> >> >> >> Did Federal Drug Laws not apply to the Felonies in question?
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > Not established they were felonies,
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Do tell how one can conspire to purchase/possess cocaine
>> >> >> >> without committing a felony.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Easily. If I was to work out an agreement with you to drive me
>> >> >> > to
>> >> >> > my
>> >> >> > dealer to buy some cocaine, we've conspired to purchase it.
>> >> >> > We're
>> >> >> > both
>> >> >> > guilty of Class A misdemeanors in New York.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> You're jumping in late. With respect to the thread and the
>> >> >> discussion,
>> >> >> the implication was the conspiracy/agreement between the dealer and
>> >> >> purchaser.
>> >> >
>> >> > That's YOUR implication, fool, and yours alone. As I and others
>> >> > have
>> >> > pointed out to you, it is legally impossible for dealers and
>> >> > purchasers
>> >> > to be co-conspirators.
>> >>
>> >> Complete bullshit.
>> >
>> > Would you like me to cite cases for you? Or would you just obtusely
>> > disbelieve them, too?
>>
>> Now how could one disbelieve an on-point citation to case law, eh Larry?
>
> You'd find a way.
>>
>>
>> >> > They have an agreement, of course, but its not a
>> >> > conspiracy
>> >>
>> >> An agreement to violate the drug distribution laws.
>> >
>> > Is not a conspiracy under any state or federal law.
>>
>> So where are those citations ?
>
> They're coming.
|