In article <653d9mF2eceeeU1@mid.individual.net>,
Reality_Check© wrote:
>
>"Larry" wrote in message
>news:x-54FA54.23355527032008@earthlink.vsrv-sjc.supernews.net...
>> In article <653422F2dlijnU1@mid.individual.net>,
>> "Reality_Check©" wrote:
>>
>>> "Larry" wrote in message
>>> news:x-E6FF6D.22011727032008@earthlink.vsrv-sjc.supernews.net...
>>> > In article <650s90F2dm612U1@mid.individual.net>,
>>> > "Reality_Check©" wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> "Larry" wrote in message
>>> >> news:x-275442.01470227032008@earthlink.vsrv-sjc.supernews.net...
>>> >> > In article <650p31F2a00g8U1@mid.individual.net>,
>>> >> > "Reality_Check©" wrote:
>>> >> >
>>> >> >> "Larry" wrote in message
>>> >> >> news:x-A92621.22111926032008@earthlink.vsrv-sjc.supernews.net...
>>> >> >> > In article <47e9e44e$0$25981$88260bb3@free.teranews.com>,
>>> >> >> > "Reality_Check©" wrote:
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >> "Bo Raxo" wrote in message
>>> >> >> >> news:poednQtjzYamQ3TanZ2dnUVZ_sOrnZ2d@comcast.com...
>>> >> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >> > "Reality_Check©" wrote in message
>>> >> >> >> > news:64u2avF2dc8sbU1@mid.individual.net...
>>> >> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >> > >
>>> >> >> >> >> Did Federal Drug Laws not apply to the Felonies in question?
>>> >> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >> > Not established they were felonies,
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >> Do tell how one can conspire to purchase/possess cocaine
>>> >> >> >> without committing a felony.
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > Easily. If I was to work out an agreement with you to drive me
>>> >> >> > to
>>> >> >> > my
>>> >> >> > dealer to buy some cocaine, we've conspired to purchase it.
>>> >> >> > We're
>>> >> >> > both
>>> >> >> > guilty of Class A misdemeanors in New York.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> You're jumping in late. With respect to the thread and the
>>> >> >> discussion,
>>> >> >> the implication was the conspiracy/agreement between the dealer and
>>> >> >> purchaser.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > That's YOUR implication, fool, and yours alone. As I and others
>>> >> > have
>>> >> > pointed out to you, it is legally impossible for dealers and
>>> >> > purchasers
>>> >> > to be co-conspirators.
>>> >>
>>> >> Complete bullshit.
>>> >
>>> > Would you like me to cite cases for you? Or would you just obtusely
>>> > disbelieve them, too?
>>>
>>> Now how could one disbelieve an on-point citation to case law, eh Larry?
>>
>> You'd find a way.
>>>
>>>
>>> >> > They have an agreement, of course, but its not a
>>> >> > conspiracy
>>> >>
>>> >> An agreement to violate the drug distribution laws.
>>> >
>>> > Is not a conspiracy under any state or federal law.
>>>
>>> So where are those citations ?
>>
>> They're coming.
>
>
For Moe, this would be proof that Jonez and Kent are the same person.
|