In article ,
Larry wrote:
>In article , tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab)
>wrote:
>
>> In article ,
>> Larry wrote:
>> >In article , tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab)
>> >wrote:
>> >
>> >> In article ,
>> >> Larry wrote:
>> >> >In article , tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab)
>> >> >wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> In article ,
>> >> >> Larry wrote:
>> >> >> >In article , tjab@wam.umd.edu (tjab)
>> >> >> >wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> In article ,
>> >> >> >> Thanatos wrote:
>> >> >> >> >In article
>> >> >> >> >,
>> >> >> >> > Larry wrote:
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >> In article <64rhs6F2crajtU1@mid.individual.net>,
>> >> >> >> >> "Reality_Check©" wrote:
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> > NY Governor Patterson admits to committing FELONIES
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> Sorry, none of these are felonies, you ignoramus.
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> Possessing cocaine is a misdemeanor, New York Penal Law 220.03,
>> >> >> >> >> as
>> >> >> >> >> is
>> >> >> >> >> the possession of marijuana, P.L. 221.10.
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> So much for a "reality check"!
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >Now watch. It'll just claim you're lying over and over again.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Possession of half a gram (not much) is a class D felony, P.L.
>> >> >> >> 220.06.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >If you look at the statute closely, unlike the other weight-based
>> >> >> >cocaine charges, this must be 500 milligrams of PURE cocaine. Since
>> >> >> >street-level cocaine is far from pure (generally, anywhere from
>> >> >> >40-80%),
>> >> >> >generally people are in possession of far more than a gram for this
>> >> >> >statute to actually apply.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >This amount of weight is far more than what most users would possess,
>> >> >> >and is often indicia of a seller.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Going in the middle of your range, 60%, we're still talking less
>> >> >> than a gram. Any particular reason why you would claim otherwise?
>> >> >
>> >> >No, why would I? Possessing less than a gram of white powder can in
>> >> >fact be a felony in NY if the pure cocaine is over 500MG.
>> >>
>> >> So why would you write, as you did, that generally people are in
>> >> possession of "far more than a gram" for the felony charge to apply?
>> >
>> >Because cocaine is mixed with other substances, known as mixing agents.
>> >When someone is in possession of such a substance, the laboratory must
>> >analyze the substance to determine how much is pure cocaine.
>> >
>> >I've seen cases where people are in possession of over 2 grams of
>> >cocaine (aggregate weight) but it's less than 500 milligrams of pure
>> >cocaine, making it a misdemeanor (and very weak).
>> >
>> >Are you really having this much trouble keeping up?
>>
>> You've now gone from "generally" to "I've seen cases."
>>
>> Are you really having this much trouble admitting you were wrong?
>
>I haven't said anything incorrect in this thread. Your problem (one of
>them, actually) is that you can't distinguish fact from opinion.
You wrote:
"If you look at the statute closely, unlike the other weight-based
cocaine charges, this must be 500 milligrams of PURE cocaine. Since
street-level cocaine is far from pure (generally, anywhere from
40-80%), generally people are in possession of far more than a gram
for this statute to actually apply."
In the middle of your range, 60%, 835 milligrams of white powder
contains more than 500 milligrams of pure cocaine.
Is it your "opinion" that 835 milligrams is far more than a gram?
>If you want to argue over whether these laws should be in effect, or
>whether buyers and sellers should be charged as co-conspirators in the
>sale, we can discuss that all you want and you can tell me why you think
>your position is better than mine.
If I wanted to argue over that, I would. I don't, so I haven't.
If you haven't said anything incorrect, why are you so desperate to
change the subject?
|