judith wrote:
> On Fri, 2 May 2008 15:39:44 -0700 (PDT), Webmanager_CritEst
> wrote:
>
>> Headmaster faces sack over criminal record... for an out-of-date
>> fishing rod licence
>>
>> By LAURA CLARK - More by this author » Last updated at 22:42pm on 2nd
>> May 2008
>>
>> Bob Yeomans: 'The offence was irrelevant'
>>
>> A headmaster caught fishing with an out-of-date rod licence is waiting
>> to hear if he will lose his job for having a criminal record.
>
> ffs - He is not facing the sack:
>
> "In the vast majority of cases, a positive trace will not mean that a
> person cannot be employed or continue to be employed."
>
> This is pure Daily Mail shite - it is not news worthy. It would be
> if he lost his job - but he hasn't.
>
>
The item in the Telegraph refers to "any contact with police" what
does that mean in practice? Does it really mean that? Or does it mean
cautions and convictions? This guy did have a conviction, but what does
"any contact" mean in this context?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1921809/Headmaster-faces-ban-over-fishing-licence.html |