In message , Redman
writes
>
>"Richard Miller" wrote in message
>news:3XlL2YmFjEHIFwEZ@seasalter0.demon.co.uk...
>> In message , Redman
>> writes
>>>
>>>"Richard Miller" wrote in message
>>>news:$6rZdrh4X4GIFwPL@seasalter0.demon.co.uk...
>>>> In message , Redman
>>>> writes
>>>>>
>>>>>"The Boss" wrote in message
>>>>>news:MaJSj.18904$yD2.17957@text.news.virginmedia.com...
>>>>>> Ratification of the EU Reform Treaty challenged in the High Court:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> www.express.co.uk/posts/view/43174/Businessman-wins-EU-referendum-bid
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> The Boss
>>>>>
>>>>>Excellent, about time. I personally can't see this getting anywhere
>>>>>though,
>>>>>the Judge/s will be paid to look the other way, especially when the
>>>>>Foreign
>>>>>Office spokesman says that other Eurosceptics brought similar challenges
>>>>>and
>>>>>failed. Doesn't bode well.
>>>>
>>>> It "doesn't bode well" for the challenge because there is no conceivable
>>>> legal basis for it. Nothing to do with judges being paid to look the
>>>> other
>>>> way. If you knew anything about our Court system, you would know that
>>>> our
>>>> judges have no fear at all about finding against the Government - even
>>>> against the Ministry of Justice.
>>>> --
>>>> Richard Miller
>>>
>>>Really, what about all the other whitewash cases we've had?
>>>
>>>Redman
>>>
>>>
>>
>> What "other whitewash cases"? What examples do you have in mind where
>> there was a clear case in law against the Government and the judiciary
>> found for the Government?
>> --
>> Richard Miller
>
>Dr David Kelly
>
What Court of law has ruled on the Kelly case? And what is your basis
for saying that there is a "clear case in law against the Government"
rather than just a range of conspiracy theories of limited credibility?
--
Richard Miller |