On Mon, 05 May 2008 17:50:26 +0100, stillnobodyhome@gmail.com wrote:
>On Sun, 04 May 2008 06:04:10 GMT, Svenne wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 3 May 2008 12:21:09 +0100, "Oscar Fister"
>> wrote:
>>
>>>Should use more pepper on your trousers,
>>
>>Very strong pepper or some other substance that would cause extreme
>>distress to the dog would be an excellent idea and something I would
>>certainly do.
>>But what would be the legal consequences of such an action?
>>Would it be illegal?
>You spilled some just before you went out when preparing your evening
>meal to save time later and didn't have time to change your trousers
>of course . How were you to know you would meet a sniffer dog .
Another problem is not knowing in advance wether you are going to be
accosted by drug nazis with sniffer dogs. It would be bothersome
walking around permanently with pepper impregnated trousers just in
case.
A much better solution for protecting your freedom would be a
transducer and a high frequency signal generator. This would emit a
sound out of the range of human hearing but would cause a blast of
discomfort to the dog. Hopefully it would even attack its handler.
That would be just beautiful. Poetic justice. Such a device would be
small and easy to carry and the drug nazis wouldn't be aware of what
was happening or who was doing it.
Svenne
|