on 05/05/2008, Svenne supposed :
> On Mon, 05 May 2008 19:22:17 +0100, Baldoni
> wrote:
>
>>> A much better solution for protecting your freedom would be a
>>> transducer and a high frequency signal generator. This would emit a
>>> sound out of the range of human hearing but would cause a blast of
>>> discomfort to the dog. Hopefully it would even attack its handler.
>>> That would be just beautiful. Poetic justice. Such a device would be
>>> small and easy to carry and the drug nazis wouldn't be aware of what
>>> was happening or who was doing it.
>
>> A jab with an electric "cattle prod" and those dogs would never come
>> near you again.
>
> While it would be very satisfying to do that, the drug nazis would see
> you do it and would likely come on you like a ton of bricks. Anyway,
> if you had no herb on you, the dogs wouldn't be interested in you.
>
> The point with a high frequency sound assault would not be to keep the
> dogs away, but to drive all the dogs around completely bonkers in a
> way the drug nazis could not detect.
Yes I can well see the point of that.
>
> It would be a general guerilla strike for freedom and liberty rather
> than immediate personal protection.
>
> Svenne
I know a guy that was turned away from visiting his friend in prison
because the dog got a sniff of dope on him. As chance would have it
the guy with him was also turned away as one of the prison officers
recognised him from when he was serving time in the same prison many
years before.
--
Baldoni
|