Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote:
> On Mon, 05 May 2008 17:59:36 +0100
> Earache wrote:
>
> > Paul C. Dickie wrote:
> > > http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/wales/7322582.stm
> > >
> >
> > Quite right too. No speeding = no stealth tax no fines and no
> > points on license as well as a safer drive.
>
> If the goal is to reduce speeding a highly visible undisguised
> ecilop car with an ossifer holding a nice big radar gun would do the
> job more effectively. If the goal is to collect fines then a well
> hidden camera is just the ticket.
If they wanted to stop speeding just fine everyone cauught £10000 and
twenty years in jail
--
|
1493408. Re: Where there's muck, there's pigs?
1493472. Re: Where there's muck, there's pigs?
1493677. Re: Where there's muck, there's pigs?
1493680. Re: Where there's muck, there's pigs?
1493714. Re: Where there's muck, there's pigs?
1493718. Re: Where there's muck, there's pigs?
1493736. Re: Where there's muck, there's pigs?
1493740. Re: Where there's muck, there's pigs?
1493745. Re: Where there's muck, there's pigs?
1493748. Re: Where there's muck, there's pigs?
1493750. Re: Where there's muck, there's pigs?
1493752. Re: Where there's muck, there's pigs?
1493762. Re: Where there's muck, there's pigs?
|
|
|