Guy King wrote:
> The message <20080506080937.92653f2e.steveo@eircom.net>
> from Steve O'Hara-Smith contains these words:
>
>> If the goal is to reduce speeding a highly visible undisguised
>> ecilop car with an ossifer holding a nice big radar gun would do the job
>> more effectively.
>
> Yebbut that only jbexes where the car's visible - as soon as the driver
> has passed the bright yellow camera they speed up.
> If the cameras are not obvious but drivers know cameras might be about,
> they'll drive more slowly [1] along the whole section.
>
> [1] But not necessarily more carefully or better.
>
Probably worse, on account of looking for invisible cameras.
The most effective way to slow drivers down is a sign that flashes the
speed limit at you as you approach. Some of them also flash up "Slow
down" or "Thank you", depending. No income, though, so councils don't
like them.
--
Tciao for Now!
John. |
1493408. Re: Where there's muck, there's pigs?
1493472. Re: Where there's muck, there's pigs?
1493677. Re: Where there's muck, there's pigs?
1493680. Re: Where there's muck, there's pigs?
1493714. Re: Where there's muck, there's pigs?
1493718. Re: Where there's muck, there's pigs?
1493736. Re: Where there's muck, there's pigs?
1493740. Re: Where there's muck, there's pigs?
1493745. Re: Where there's muck, there's pigs?
1493748. Re: Where there's muck, there's pigs?
1493750. Re: Where there's muck, there's pigs?
1493752. Re: Where there's muck, there's pigs?
1493762. Re: Where there's muck, there's pigs?
1493769. Re: Where there's muck, there's pigs?
1493770. Re: Where there's muck, there's pigs?
|
|
|