Guy King wrote:
> from John Williamson contains these words:
>
> > Probably worse, on account of looking for invisible cameras.
>
> Ah - many of us have found a really clever answer to that. Stay within
> the limit and everything else happens automatically.
Yes, but it doesn't allow one to put on an air of high-horsed insult
while being a bloody dangerous git on the road, so it's not an
acceptable solution to some.
Richard |
1493408. Re: Where there's muck, there's pigs?
1493472. Re: Where there's muck, there's pigs?
1493677. Re: Where there's muck, there's pigs?
1493680. Re: Where there's muck, there's pigs?
1493714. Re: Where there's muck, there's pigs?
1493718. Re: Where there's muck, there's pigs?
1493736. Re: Where there's muck, there's pigs?
1493740. Re: Where there's muck, there's pigs?
1493745. Re: Where there's muck, there's pigs?
1493748. Re: Where there's muck, there's pigs?
1493750. Re: Where there's muck, there's pigs?
1493752. Re: Where there's muck, there's pigs?
1493762. Re: Where there's muck, there's pigs?
1493769. Re: Where there's muck, there's pigs?
1493770. Re: Where there's muck, there's pigs?
1493774. Re: Where there's muck, there's pigs?
1493780. Re: Where there's muck, there's pigs?
1493793. Re: Where there's muck, there's pigs?
|
|
|