In message , judith
writes
>On Tue, 06 May 2008 12:42:07 GMT, Mike_B
>wrote:
>
>>In message , judith
>> writes
>>>On Tue, 06 May 2008 06:42:09 GMT, Mike_B
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>In message , judith
>>>> writes
>>>>>On Mon, 05 May 2008 10:30:06 GMT, Mike_B
>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>In message <82nt1414hk5j8t7ul78panjm2td966h4di@4ax.com>, judith
>>>>>> writes
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Forgive me asking - what's your newspaper of choice - the Daily
>>>>>>>Express or the Daily Mail - I am wondering how you seem to be
>>>>>>>misguided?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Just for fun I did a 5 minute Google exercise and found even more
>>>>>>numerous reports about racism in the Police, racism in the general
>>>>>>populace and racism in the Conservative Party.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I don't thin the poster was suggesting that the BNP has no racists in
>>>>>>it,
>>>>>
>>>>>I don't think she was either - she was quite clearly saying *the BNP
>>>>>aren't racist*
>>>>>
>>>>>I do not believe that the Police as an organisation are racist;
>>>>> I do
>>>>>not believe that the Conservative Party are racist, in fact I can't
>>>>>think of many organisations which are racist.
>>>>>
>>>>>I do however believe that the BNP are inherently racist; I would
>>>>>suspect that my view might be quite common.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>I also suspect your view to be quite common, and indeed it is my view as
>>>>well. The difference is, I am able to understand the OPs question and
>>>>realise that my view is not based on having researched anything about
>>>>the party and it may not remain my view if I had done so.
>>>
>>>
>>>"The difference is, I am able to understand the OPs question"
>>>
>>>I just love it when one poster has to point out how smart they are
>>>compared to others - I think it says an awful lot about them.
>>>
>>>(I do wish you would stop trying to read in to posts something which
>>>is just not there)
>>>
>>
>>Judith, you either didn't understand the question or you replied by
>>deliberately ignoring it. Which was it then?
>
>
>I am not sure which question you are referring to - but that is
>neither here nor there, as the only reason I responded to the OP was
>that I genuinely thought it was a troll.
>
>I read the phrases:
>
>allowing Shia law
>strict Islamist protocols
>compromising our national identity.
>Asian people and white people do not mix well
>the future when there will be no white people living in England.
>am I the only one who feels uncomfortable?
>
>If it was not a troll then I apologise to the OP - if it was a troll
>then it was a classic: drop some phrases in to an innocuous post and
>sit back.
>
>(Why not just put me back in your kill-file if you do not like my
>style - it certainly seems to touch a nerve with you - I won't cry -
>honestly I won't)
>
>
>
Me? From reading above, its you who was complaining about my style, not
the other way around.
--
Mike_B |