"Palindrome" wrote in message
news:T95Uj.521740$ic2.389261@fe09.news.easynews.com...
> Janitor of Lunacy wrote:
>>
>> "habshi" wrote in message
>> news:4820d3ee.2304656@news.clara.net...
>>> Recently was the target of an attempted burglary.
>>> So the police came and gave me this smart water and a gun to shoot
>>> next time (just kidding!) .
>>
>> Wouldn't a UV pen and a National Insurance number be better? It's also
>> more robust than a postcode, since it doesn't change when you move house.
>> Why pay for a complicated and expensive solution (sic) when a simpler and
>> cheaper alternative exists?
>
> Wouldn't a label on the window, stating "All items of value are
> permanently security-marked" be rather better (not to mention even
> cheaper)?
>
> Personally, I'd rather go in for batesian mimicry than mimic an apis
> dorsata..
>
> --
> Sue
So if you had criminal tendencies you would be deterred by this?
http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/infoweb/undercover.jpg
To me it says "Carry on with impunity, this sign is the limit of our
recourses".
--
Graham
%Profound_observation%
|