In message
<44caed01-d782-4d4d-9354-feea4ff62fe9@j33g2000pri.googlegroups.com>,
frediesmith@googlemail.com writes
>On May 7, 5:54 pm, Mike_B wrote:
>>
>> IMO f you have had your judgement, the defendant has refused to pay and
>> hasn't made an application to court then it is time to decide whether or
>> not you want your money back. If so, move to enforcement.
>
>Mike_B makes it all sound so easy doesnt he....and as you would expect
>within this group he is known as a F**kwit, some problems with his
>suggestion to move to enforcement are:
>
>1. Enforcememt costs money, so if you do this, expect to pay out more
>money.
>2. And if an application for arehearing has been made and you go for
>an enforcement order and get one, you will be out of pocket and need
>to go back to court to begin again
>3. Tricks to watch out for then are NOT to go for an enforcement order
>unless you are sure no application to re hear has been made.
>3a. And even if you go for an enforcement order and get one, it can be
>voided, if the person says hes going to go back to court to get a
>rehearing when the bailiffs appear to collect .
>4. You could then become a victim of costs in the cause and have to go
>round the block several times without getting a cent for your trouble.
Great suggestions as ever from our Australian know-.-all.
On second thoughts... there were no suggestions at all in your post as
to how the OP might get her money back. So what are you saying Tony? Are
you just stating the bleeding obvious that enforcement costs money (and
will cost money in 6 months time just as it will tomorrow) or are you
suggesting that fact should lead her to forget her money and not bother?
--
Mike_B |