Cynic wrote:
> On Wed, 07 May 2008 20:56:02 +0100, ŽiŠardo wrote:
>
>> No policy should pay out if the insured event is caused by the actions
>> of the insured.
>
> If that were true, many policies would be useless. I could agree with
> not paying out if the insured person *deliberately* caused the insured
> damage, but not if they caused the damage unintentionally, even if
> through careless or reckless behaviour.
>
Yes, "deliberate" action.
--
Moving things in still pictures! |
1494059. Re: Mark Saunders, Barrister.
1494067. Re: Mark Saunders, Barrister.
1494068. Re: Mark Saunders, Barrister.
1494076. Re: Mark Saunders, Barrister.
1494083. Re: Mark Saunders, Barrister.
1494085. Re: Mark Saunders, Barrister.
1494091. Re: Mark Saunders, Barrister.
1494098. Re: Mark Saunders, Barrister.
1494102. Re: Mark Saunders, Barrister.
1494103. Re: Mark Saunders, Barrister.
1494498. Re: Mark Saunders, Barrister.
1494577. Re: Mark Saunders, Barrister.
1494581. Re: Mark Saunders, Barrister.
1494581. Re: Mark Saunders, Barrister.
1494633. Re: Mark Saunders, Barrister.
1494683. Re: Mark Saunders, Barrister.
1494690. Re: Mark Saunders, Barrister.
1494742. Re: Mark Saunders, Barrister.
1494750. Re: Mark Saunders, Barrister.
1494898. Re: Mark Saunders, Barrister.
|
|
|