"Joseph Hill" wrote in message
news:96f7a652-8957-4e78-a142-b1991aa36ec4@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
> On 8 May, 20:03, James Hammerton wrote:
>> Yet more guilt by accusation in Britain. From the BBC
>> (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/7389547.stm):
>
> An interesting comment by the organisers of this...
>
> From the article: "We are limiting access to the database to employers
> who can comply with the Information Commissioner's employment
> practices code," he says. "We're not going to allow Mr Smith's
> hardware store.""
>
> So what level of company does one have to be - and why shouldn't Mr.
> Smith's hardware store report or know about thieving staff? What size
> of company must one own before being allowed access to this database?
>
> After all, if it was any limited company wishing to cough up the
> registration fee - well, I'm sure someone on here would share the
> password :p
Under the libel laws this system is basically illegal, any compamy
willinig to use it is not fit to be an employer.
Will it include the employers who lose unfair dismissal cases
so employees know which firms to avoid working for??????
|