On Thu, 8 May 2008 21:17:58 +0100, Hot Badger Deluxe wrote:
> On Thu, 08 May 2008 21:04:00 +0100, Baldoni wrote:
>
>> Prai Jei has brought this to us :
>>> Lord Turkey Cough set the following eddies spiralling through the space-time
>>> continuum:
>>
>> If the employer had not risked his money by investing in a company in
>> the first instance, there would be no jobs.
>>
>> If you can get a Polish person to work for you then do that. Far less
>> trouble and they will do the job with a smile on their face. No
>> bullshit sick days for being pissed the night before either.
>
> Have to agree. The people who moved from London to Portsmouth were Polish.
> Did a superb job, with no whingeing, as previous English workers had done.
> And one of them had great taste in music - big fan of the Hafler Trio. They
> gave me a lift in the cab, and we talked about music all the way. The name
> of the company was Admiral.
That's the people who moved ME from London to Portsmouth.
--
All universal moral principles are idle fancies. |
1494445. Re: Dismissed employees to be blacklisted, is it legal?
1494448. Re: Dismissed employees to be blacklisted, is it legal?
1494457. Re: Dismissed employees to be blacklisted, is it legal?
1494474. Re: Dismissed employees to be blacklisted, is it legal?
1494481. Re: Dismissed employees to be blacklisted, is it legal?
1494482. Re: Dismissed employees to be blacklisted, is it legal?
1494486. Re: Dismissed employees to be blacklisted, is it legal?
1494488. Re: Dismissed employees to be blacklisted, is it legal?
1494584. Re: Dismissed employees to be blacklisted, is it legal?
1494764. Re: Dismissed employees to be blacklisted, is it legal?
|
|
|