On May 8, 2:39 pm, MM wrote:
> On Thu, 08 May 2008 11:18:09 +0100, judith
> wrote:
>
>
>
> >On Thu, 8 May 2008 07:45:38 +0100, "Dr Zoidberg"
> > wrote:
>
> >>"judith" wrote in message
> >>news:c4o424hsceinn3ppd1jtgbkhtg32fsp573@4ax.com...
> >>> Police should be harassing badly behaved youths by openly filming them
> >>> and hounding them at home to make their lives as uncomfortable as
> >>> possible, the home secretary will say today.
>
> >>> The crime initiative is part of a government strategy to win back
> >>> voters by proposing more radical approaches to tackling deep seated
> >>> problems
>
> >>>http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2008/may/08/police.ukcrime
>
> >>> ffs - Innocent until ........... the police take a dislike to you.
>
> >>Surely if they are badly behaved , then they *aren't* innocent?
>
> >Behaved badly - in whose opinion?
>
> "The police followed 14 people in their teens and early 20s. Each was
> well known to the force, having built up criminal records for offences
> such as intimidation, burglary, criminal damage, antisocial behaviour
> and vehicle crime."
>
> So, which part of intimidation, burglary, criminal damage, antisocial
> behaviour or vehicle crime did you have trouble in understanding,
> judith?
>
> >I'm sorry - I thought that we were all innocent until proven guilty -
> >to which we can now add - disliked by the police.
>
> But only after having built up criminal records for offences
> such as intimidation, burglary, criminal damage, antisocial behaviour
> and vehicle crime.
So serving your time no longer means you have repaid your debt to
society? Then they should not be out on the streets yet.
|