On Thu, 8 May 2008 16:23:48 -0700 (PDT),
someone_else_of_course@hotmail.co.uk wrote:
> ok, not criminal, but actionable (not sure if that's the correct
> term), my question is towards liability and ownership - does one imply
> the other?
Off the top of my head I can't think of offences that are committed by
merely the ownership of anything, as distinct from say their possession,
sale, carrying them in public etc. There may be some exotic offences, such
as say owning slaves or wild animals, but those would not be things you
could produce and so fall under your employer's claims.
Tony |
1494578. Re: Liability of content, by owners
1494579. Re: Liability of content, by owners
1494580. Re: Liability of content, by owners
1494604. Re: Liability of content, by owners
1494611. Re: Liability of content, by owners
1494793. Re: Liability of content, by owners
1494809. Re: Liability of content, by owners
1494809. Re: Liability of content, by owners
1494887. Re: Liability of content, by owners
1494920. Re: Liability of content, by owners
1494938. Re: Liability of content, by owners
1495743. Re: Liability of content, by owners
|
|
|