Passports: HOME | EUROPE | AMERICAS, AUSTRALIA and OCEANIA | ASIA | AFRICA | OTHER DOCUMENTS
National Anthems:[ www.national-anthems.net ] ++
Travel:[ Europe ] [ Asia ] [ USA-Canada ] [ Latin-America ] [ Africa ] [ Australia ] [ more ]
[ Australia legal ] [ U.K. legal ] [ U.S. visa ] [ Immigration ] [ Marriage based U.S visa ]



Subject: Re: What's the difference between this and unlawful killing? Posted on: Fri, 09 May 2008 10:36:09 +0100

On Thu, 08 May 2008 22:56:02 GMT, Periander <4rubbish@britwar.co.uk>
wrote:

>> They are both very similar to the incident in question. An authority
>> figure using disproportionate force to stop what they see as
>> misbehaviour in a way that they must know is likely to cause
>> significant injury.

>No they are both straw men in that there is no comparison between the
>examples cited. The man who died whilst being detained was being
>detained by lawful authority because of his criminal behaviour.

Reasonable chastisement is lawful to use on a child. Reasonable force
is lawful to use when effecting an arrest.

When the force used ends up causing fatal injuries it cannot be
considered reasonable and so becomes unlawful in *both* cases.

The analogy is perfectly sound.

--
Cynic