On 8 May, 21:21, blu...@aol.com wrote:
> Same old copying and pasting shyte, let me try and give you some free
> advice...........................NO-ONE IS INTERESTED, repeat NO-ONE
> IS INTERESTED , go out and get yourselves a life. There are no media
> outlets, MP's, MEP's, CCRC, the U.N =A0or any other organisation out
> there who are remotely interested in your farsical cover-up theory.....
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D
You say no one is interested, yet a number of people have posted
responses on usenet indicating that they are fascinated by this case
and want to know more about it.
YOU are very interested in this, to the point of obsession, as you
insist on following everything that is said about it and posting your
usual vague generalisations and unsubstantiated jibes (straight out of
*the infiltrators' script*).
And I repeat yet again, the people you mention are afraid to address
this scandal now, because Ronald Gregory is still alive and they fear
a libel action from him.
We can expect some movement on this after Ronald Gregory dies. |