On Fri, 9 May 2008 04:13:07 -0700 (PDT), Mel Rowing
wrote:
>On May 9, 11:30 am, Alang wrote:
>> On Thu, 8 May 2008 15:20:27 -0700 (PDT), Mel Rowing
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> wrote:
>> >On May 7, 5:39 pm, Alang wrote:
>> >> On Wed, 7 May 2008 07:20:47 -0700 (PDT), Mel Rowing
>>
>> >> >Further, re the Mail photo. The officers knee was not across the man's
>> >> >neck. It was positioned in the nape. If a full grown man knelt with
>> >> >his full weight on another's neck whilst he was in a prostrate
>> >> >position on the floor, very severe damage would be caused indeed.
>>
>> >> There were four of them. Pressure on the chest would stop someone
>> >> breathing in some circumstances as I know only too well.
>>
>> >Yes and you will note that one is pressing on the legs/feet to prevent
>> >him kicking.
>>
>> >Two others are holding his arms in position so that the fourth
>> >(allegedly kneeling on the arrestees neck!) can apply the handcuffs.
>>
>> >Nobody is applying pressure to the chest or abdomen.
>>
>> Yes they are.
>> I suggest you examine the picture in the link I supplied
>
>I did if your alter persona is Dead Paul!
It isn't
>
>If so why do you choose to create confusion by using multiple handles?
>So you can hold a discussion with yourself perhaps!
|