On May 9, 3:52 pm, Cynic wrote:
> On Fri, 9 May 2008 12:36:09 +0100, "M.I.5=BE"
>
> wrote:
> >How about extreme .ography? Ownership of these either is (or is about=
to
> >become) a criminal act.
>
> No it is not. *Possession* is about to become a criminal act, not
> ownership.
>
> --
> Cynic
Thanks to all for the input. One last question, what about libel? If
someone wishes to sue a website which is technically the intellectual
property of my company, would they therefore be able to sue the
company? I don't understand how a company can take ownership of what I
produce, but avoid the fallout if I produce something which causes
trouble. Strikes me that they get the best of both worlds. |
1494578. Re: Liability of content, by owners
1494579. Re: Liability of content, by owners
1494580. Re: Liability of content, by owners
1494604. Re: Liability of content, by owners
1494611. Re: Liability of content, by owners
1494793. Re: Liability of content, by owners
1494809. Re: Liability of content, by owners
1494809. Re: Liability of content, by owners
1494887. Re: Liability of content, by owners
1494920. Re: Liability of content, by owners
1494938. Re: Liability of content, by owners
1495743. Re: Liability of content, by owners
|
|
|