Re: Photography and the Law - united-kingdom

National Anthems:[ www.national-anthems.net ] ++
Travel:[ Europe ] [ Asia ] [ USA-Canada ] [ Latin-America ] [ Africa ] [ Australia ] [ more ]

[ Australia legal ] [ U.K. legal ] [ U.S. visa ] [ Immigration ] [ Marriage based U.S visa ]

[ Home ][ united-kingdom_legal Home ] [ First Article ][ Previous Article ] [ Next Article ] [ Newest Article ]

Re: Photography and the Law

Posted on: Fri, 09 May 2008 13:12:58 -0400

On Thu, 08 May 2008 14:15:48 -0400, krishnananda wrote:

>There are more Byzantine restrictions, on what can be photographed. In
>New York City it is illegal to photograph a bridge,

Nonsense. It's forbidden to take photographs *from* or *on* Port Authority owned
bridges, but it's perfectly legal to take photographs *of* the bridges, from
public land.

>or any aspect of the
>Office of the Chief Medical Examiner [personal experience].

Not sure what you mean by 'aspect' - are you saying you weren't allowed to
photograph the building?

Mike (in New York)
--
http://www.corestore.org
'As I walk along these shores
I am the history within'

[ Home ][ united-kingdom_legal Home ] [ First Article ][ Previous Article ] [ Next Article ] [ Newest Article ]