"Mike Ross" wrote in message
news:1s0924ta7k7i55nm6b1an0bsa5mn9rpvtn@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 08 May 2008 14:15:48 -0400, krishnananda wrote:
>
>>There are more Byzantine restrictions, on what can be photographed. In
>>New York City it is illegal to photograph a bridge,
>
> Nonsense. It's forbidden to take photographs *from* or *on* Port Authority
> owned
> bridges, but it's perfectly legal to take photographs *of* the bridges,
> from
> public land.
>
Near the Throgs Neck Bridge in Queens, there are lots of "no photographs
permitted" signs.
I have not walked across the GW, which is a PA owned bridge in quite a
while, but I can't imagine them prohibiting photos.Yeah! I know it is not a
PA bridge, but TBTA.
With some planning you can get permission to photograph almost anything
through the Mayor's office.
--
Peter
|