In message <68jl5aF2s6916U2@mid.individual.net>, Carole
writes
>Mike Ross wrote:
>> Nonsense. It's forbidden to take photographs *from* or *on* Port
>>Authority owned
>> bridges, but it's perfectly legal to take photographs *of* the bridges, from
>> public land.
>
>Not anymore. I've had friends who were in parks in Brooklyn told to
>stop taking photographs of the bridges by NYPD.
You might find, as in the UK , the police don't know the law for
photographers.
BTW if the PA own the bridges and it is "no photographs" surely it is a
civil matter not a criminal matter and the Police should not be
involved?
--
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
\/\/\/\/\ Chris Hills Staffs England /\/\/\/\/
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
|