Re: Told I've been overpaid - united-kingdom

National Anthems:[ www.national-anthems.net ] ++
Travel:[ Europe ] [ Asia ] [ USA-Canada ] [ Latin-America ] [ Africa ] [ Australia ] [ more ]

[ Australia legal ] [ U.K. legal ] [ U.S. visa ] [ Immigration ] [ Marriage based U.S visa ]

[ Home ][ united-kingdom_legal Home ] [ First Article ][ Previous Article ] [ Next Article ] [ Newest Article ]

Re: Told I've been overpaid

Posted on: Sat, 10 May 2008 01:25:18 +0100

wrote in message
news:068a17f1-5160-4e8d-ab61-389f26f7de6d@x19g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
That being said I think you will find that Estoppel was limited to
examining existing fact and extended to apply to future intentions
using *High Trees House LTD. which over came Pinnel's Case and if you
wish to argue mistake ....you'd better argue Promissory Estoppel and
not Estoppel.

Up to a point. "Mistake" in contract is not an equitable concept; promissory
(as opposed to
other versions) estoppel is; and there were many cases between Pinnel & HTH.

Hughes v Metropolitan Railway (1877), anyone?

[ Home ][ united-kingdom_legal Home ] [ First Article ][ Previous Article ] [ Next Article ] [ Newest Article ]