Passports: HOME | EUROPE | AMERICAS, AUSTRALIA and OCEANIA | ASIA | AFRICA | OTHER DOCUMENTS
National Anthems:[ www.national-anthems.net ] ++
Travel:[ Europe ] [ Asia ] [ USA-Canada ] [ Latin-America ] [ Africa ] [ Australia ] [ more ]
[ Australia legal ] [ U.K. legal ] [ U.S. visa ] [ Immigration ] [ Marriage based U.S visa ]



Re: Photography and the Law Posted on: Fri, 09 May 2008 20:34:40 -0400

On Fri, 09 May 2008 15:48:30 -0400, krishnananda wrote:

>In article <482491d0$0$13860$8f2e0ebb@news.shared-secrets.com>,
> "Peter" wrote:
>
>> I have not walked across the GW, which is a PA owned bridge in quite a
>> while, but I can't imagine them prohibiting photos.Yeah!
>
>I drive across it twice a week. There are signs everywhere prohibiting
>photographs.

Photographs ON or FROM the bridge; the authorities have no power to prohibit
photography OF the bridge, as I said. But the bridge people do have the same
power anyone else has; to prohibit photography on their private property.

Mike
--
http://www.corestore.org
'As I walk along these shores
I am the history within'
1494400. Re: Photography and the Law
1494406. Re: Photography and the Law
1494409. Re: Photography and the Law
1494419. Re: Photography and the Law
1494430. Re: Photography and the Law
1494434. Re: Photography and the Law
1494436. Re: Photography and the Law
1494437. Re: Photography and the Law
1494441. Re: Photography and the Law
1494454. Re: Photography and the Law
1495034. Re: Photography and the Law
1495035. Re: Photography and the Law
1495038. Re: Photography and the Law
1495059. Re: Photography and the Law
1495060. Re: Photography and the Law
1495066. Re: Photography and the Law
1495306. Re: Photography and the Law
1495307. Re: Photography and the Law
1495324. Re: Photography and the Law
1495357. Re: Photography and the Law