Passports: HOME | EUROPE | AMERICAS, AUSTRALIA and OCEANIA | ASIA | AFRICA | OTHER DOCUMENTS
National Anthems:[ www.national-anthems.net ] ++
Travel:[ Europe ] [ Asia ] [ USA-Canada ] [ Latin-America ] [ Africa ] [ Australia ] [ more ]
[ Australia legal ] [ U.K. legal ] [ U.S. visa ] [ Immigration ] [ Marriage based U.S visa ]



Re: Photography and the Law Posted on: Sat, 10 May 2008 08:38:10 +0100

Mike Ross writes:

> Nonsense. It's forbidden to take photographs *from* or *on* Port
> Authority owned bridges, but it's perfectly legal to take photographs
> *of* the bridges, from public land.

Does anyone know the reason for prohibiting photography from the
bridges, or do they prohibit it simply because they can? I do not know
about New York, but in many towns and cities bridges provide very good
platforms for (pedestrians) taking photographs.
1494400. Re: Photography and the Law
1494406. Re: Photography and the Law
1494409. Re: Photography and the Law
1494419. Re: Photography and the Law
1494430. Re: Photography and the Law
1494434. Re: Photography and the Law
1494436. Re: Photography and the Law
1494437. Re: Photography and the Law
1494441. Re: Photography and the Law
1494454. Re: Photography and the Law
1495059. Re: Photography and the Law
1495060. Re: Photography and the Law
1495066. Re: Photography and the Law
1495306. Re: Photography and the Law
1495307. Re: Photography and the Law
1495324. Re: Photography and the Law
1495357. Re: Photography and the Law
1495455. Re: Photography and the Law
1495458. Re: Photography and the Law
1495477. Re: Photography and the Law