Passports: HOME | EUROPE | AMERICAS, AUSTRALIA and OCEANIA | ASIA | AFRICA | OTHER DOCUMENTS
National Anthems:[ www.national-anthems.net ] ++
Travel:[ Europe ] [ Asia ] [ USA-Canada ] [ Latin-America ] [ Africa ] [ Australia ] [ more ]
[ Australia legal ] [ U.K. legal ] [ U.S. visa ] [ Immigration ] [ Marriage based U.S visa ]



Re: Photography and the Law Posted on: Sat, 10 May 2008 08:39:20 +0100


>> What is the situation regarding "model releases"? I understand that they
>> are
>> required for commercial photography, but aren't newspaper photos
>> considered
>> as such? I'm sure Fred West (and other infamous individuals) didn't have
>> to
>> sign permission before the Sun could publish his "perp. walk".
>
> You can photograph anyone in a public place as long as their photo is not
> used for commercial purposes. If you wish to use that persons image for
> commercial purposes (i.e. to promote or advertise) then a model release
> form is required.
>
> MC
To clarify this: If you sell a picture of a general scene which contains
people, to say a calendar company, you don't need release forms. It you
specifically sell an image of a person or persons for advertising or
promotion you do. It's a tricky one really and depends on the use and common
sense.

PDM


1494400. Re: Photography and the Law
1494406. Re: Photography and the Law
1494409. Re: Photography and the Law
1494419. Re: Photography and the Law
1494430. Re: Photography and the Law
1494434. Re: Photography and the Law
1494436. Re: Photography and the Law
1494437. Re: Photography and the Law
1494441. Re: Photography and the Law
1494454. Re: Photography and the Law
1495060. Re: Photography and the Law
1495066. Re: Photography and the Law
1495306. Re: Photography and the Law
1495307. Re: Photography and the Law
1495324. Re: Photography and the Law
1495357. Re: Photography and the Law
1495455. Re: Photography and the Law
1495458. Re: Photography and the Law
1495477. Re: Photography and the Law
1495478. Re: Photography and the Law