On Sat, 10 May 2008 09:09:44 GMT, Periander <4rubbish@britwar.co.uk>
wrote:
>MM wrote in
>news:2eoa241ej10n4cnu4u74ileth66077o2q0@4ax.com:
>
>> On Sat, 10 May 2008 08:36:30 GMT, Periander <4rubbish@britwar.co.uk>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>Get of your high horse Richard, some people are particularly
>>>vulnerable to sudden death following exertions/restraint and they may
>>>die. There’s no way of telling who these people are in advance, it's a
>>>shame but it's inevitable that some people will die. To be frank the
>>>methods used by British police to restrain folks are just about as
>>>mild as possible compatible with the need to actually restrain and
>>>prevent that person harming others whilst restrained.
>>
>> Inevitable and NECESSARY, so as to send a warning to others not to
>> mess with the cops, no? "Mess with us and we could kill you!" Isn't
>> that really the message from all this?
>
>Grow up, the Daily mail was kind enough to publish at least one photo from
>the incident,the photo clearly shows that excessive force was not being
>used. As I pointed out before, either folks are restrained the way they are
>now or they're shot, tazared or punched/kicked to the ground. The choice is
>yours ...
And there was I, trying to provide you with a graceful exit! I won't
bother next time.
MM |