MM wrote in
news:4qva24p94sh2qb2o0v6l8j282ei7j5lv1c@4ax.com:
> On Sat, 10 May 2008 09:09:44 GMT, Periander <4rubbish@britwar.co.uk>
> wrote:
>
>>MM wrote in
>>news:2eoa241ej10n4cnu4u74ileth66077o2q0@4ax.com:
>>
>>> On Sat, 10 May 2008 08:36:30 GMT, Periander <4rubbish@britwar.co.uk>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>Get of your high horse Richard, some people are particularly
>>>>vulnerable to sudden death following exertions/restraint and they
>>>>may die. There’s no way of telling who these people are in advance,
>>>>it's a shame but it's inevitable that some people will die. To be
>>>>frank the methods used by British police to restrain folks are just
>>>>about as mild as possible compatible with the need to actually
>>>>restrain and prevent that person harming others whilst restrained.
>>>
>>> Inevitable and NECESSARY, so as to send a warning to others not to
>>> mess with the cops, no? "Mess with us and we could kill you!" Isn't
>>> that really the message from all this?
>>
>>Grow up, the Daily mail was kind enough to publish at least one photo
>>from the incident,the photo clearly shows that excessive force was not
>>being used. As I pointed out before, either folks are restrained the
>>way they are now or they're shot, tazared or punched/kicked to the
>>ground. The choice is yours ...
>
> And there was I, trying to provide you with a graceful exit! I won't
> bother next time.
Then I miss read what you wrote
--
Regards,
Periander |