"Nick" wrote in message
news:68lsj6F2tfovgU1@mid.individual.net...
> nikeshoes wrote:
>> "Nick" wrote in message
>> news:68lg5eF2tn421U1@mid.individual.net...
>>> Cub Reporter wrote:
>>>
>>>> We will now be able to prosecute UK nationals here for a .ual
>>>> offence committed against a child anywhere in the world, so long as
>>>> the act committed would be a relevant offence in this country. We have
>>>> also raised the age of a child for these purposes from 16 to 18. This
>>>> has all been achieved through the Criminal Justice and Immigration
>>>> Bill which received Royal Assent on Thursday 8 May.
>>> Out of curiosity what .ual offences are illegal here with 17 year olds
>>> but not 18 year olds. I know possessing .ual pictures of a 17 year old
>>> is a crime but that is a crime regardless of where the picture is taken.
>>> So what actual crimes are they talking about, someone who had pictures
>>> abroad but didn't bring them back?
>>
>> You could not meet a 17yo having met them on the internet, this would be
>> meeting a child after grooming.
>
> Where is this specified. I understand that it is wrong to use the internet
> to meet a child of 17 that you intend to abuse. But having . with a
> child of 17 isn't abuse, is it?
What is then ?
|