Passports: HOME | EUROPE | AMERICAS, AUSTRALIA and OCEANIA | ASIA | AFRICA | OTHER DOCUMENTS
National Anthems:[ www.national-anthems.net ] ++
Travel:[ Europe ] [ Asia ] [ USA-Canada ] [ Latin-America ] [ Africa ] [ Australia ] [ more ]
[ Australia legal ] [ U.K. legal ] [ U.S. visa ] [ Immigration ] [ Marriage based U.S visa ]

Re: Repercussions of a fixed penalty notice for theft Posted on: Sat, 10 May 2008 16:56:23 +0100


"johannes" wrote in message
news:4825BE90.C26B7D08@sizefit846737606ter.com...
>
>
> TimB wrote:
>>
>> IMO, your son should have opted for the latter,
>> since the case you describe doesn't constitute theft, but that's by-
>> the-by now).
>
> I disagree with you there. Obtaining goods by deception is theft.

Only in informal language. The law makes a distinction, and always has done,
which used to be between sections 1 - 7 & 15 of the Theft Act 1968, now
redefined in the Fraud Act 2002.
1494932. Re: Repercussions of a fixed penalty notice for theft
1494947. Re: Repercussions of a fixed penalty notice for theft
1494947. Re: Repercussions of a fixed penalty notice for theft
1494950. Re: Repercussions of a fixed penalty notice for theft
1494961. Re: Repercussions of a fixed penalty notice for theft
1494999. Re: Repercussions of a fixed penalty notice for theft
1495048. Re: Repercussions of a fixed penalty notice for theft
1495069. Re: Repercussions of a fixed penalty notice for theft
1495075. Re: Repercussions of a fixed penalty notice for theft
1495090. Re: Repercussions of a fixed penalty notice for theft
1495235. Re: Repercussions of a fixed penalty notice for theft
1495260. Re: Repercussions of a fixed penalty notice for theft