"Mike Ross" wrote in message
news:g13c2418na0o444qnfood0hdltkgm24lqr@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 10 May 2008 13:41:40 -0400, "Peter"
> wrote:
>
>>"Mike Ross" wrote in message
>>news:3pr9241dqqr7ia6ftpet70eifaerrg7vh0@4ax.com...
>
>>> Which apply (as the rules you posted pointed out) to "Every motorist and
>>> pedestrian using any facility under the jurisdiction and control of the
>>> Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority"
>
>>Which jurisdictional laws are you writing about?
>
> Sorry, we've drifted a little and are discussing New York.
I was beginning to wonder. These anti photo rules were made on the basis of
Homeland Security. Some make sense, others are ridiculous. Think of a
bureaucracy that doesn't want criticism, so they get Federal funding. then a
portion of the funding is used to hire somebody to write rules that that are
used to justify the funding. This happens with any bureaucracy. Since
unspent money may not get replaced in the following budget year, it must be
spent, whether needed or not.
--
Peter
|