"peterwn" wrote in message
news:bfc58770-6dca-47e2-b4c8-4ca74de05afd@l28g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
On May 12, 7:10 am, Webmanager_CritEst wrote:
> May 12, 2008
>
> Child can have right to privacy infringed by surreptitious photography
>
> Court of Appeal
>
> Published May 12, 2008
>
> Murray v Express Newspapers plc and Another
>
> Before Sir Anthony Clarke, Master of the Rolls, Lord Justice Laws and
> Lord Justice Thomas
>
> Judgment May 7, 2008
>
> It was arguable that a child had a reasonable expectation that he
> would not be targeted in order to obtain photographs in a public place
> for publication which the person taking or procuring the photographs
> knew would be objected to on the child’s behalf ........
>
> http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/law/reports/article391...
>
All the Appeal Court did was to overturn the lower court's striking
out. Express Newspapers may still 'win' at a substantive hearing.
|